No, I don't mean Donald Trump: I mean Roe v. Wade.
The silent murder of millions of children, brought about by this Supreme Court decision, was the culmination of decades of work done by those who sought to undermine the moral, legal and intellectual foundations of the American Republic. It's origins are traced at least to Woodrow Wilson, who sought to bend the plain-language of the Constitution to the corrupt dictums of Progressivism.
In the future, government agencies such as the 'Department of Education' and the 'Department of Labor' to name just a few, will be recognized for what they are - unlawful regime apparatuses that tax, harass, and oppress the American people.
We must make a clean break with the holocaust that began nationally on January 22, 1973.
I find nothing in the language or history of the Constitution to support the Court's judgment. The Court simply fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant women and, with scarcely any reason or authority for its action, invests that right with sufficient substance to override most existing state abortion statutes. The upshot is that the people and the legislatures of the 50 States are constitutionally disentitled to weigh the relative importance of the continued existence and development of the fetus, on the one hand, against a spectrum of possible impacts on the woman, on the other hand. As an exercise of raw judicial power, the Court perhaps has authority to do what it does today; but, in my view, its judgment is an improvident and extravagant exercise of the power of judicial review that the Constitution extends to this Court.[57][58]
-Justice Byron White
I am mildly encouraged, at best, by President Trump's choice for Supreme Court Justice, Neil Gorsuch, whose circumspect statements on Roe v. Wade do not seem by any means to address the national crisis of child murder taking place in the United States every single day.
No comments:
Post a Comment