If a terrorist plot were uncovered to destroy the city of Seattle with a thermonuclear weapon, but all you had to do was arrest three to five terrorists to prevent the more than 600,000 people of Seattle from being brutally destroyed, would you do it? Say arresting them wasn't even that hard - you know right where they are and it's simply a matter of alerting the police.
No brainer, right?
Then why we don't we arrest the following three Supreme Court justices, whose "pro-choice" - read - "I'm publicly in favor of child murder" positions make them the people in authority most directly responsible for the savage deaths of at least 699,202 human beings killed by 'abortion' in the year 2012. Because they've all stated publicly, their position that, in contrary to all fact, reason, and moral law, the Constitution of the United States somehow condones, and indeed, enshrines the 'right' to murder children.
We expect to be led and inspired by Supreme Court justices toward a better concept of law and the Republic. But the three below wade to work every day through an ocean of children's blood. These three bear responsibility for the atrocity of genocide. They should be stripped of their office, taken in to custody, and tried for their crimes against humanity.
Justice Stephen D. Breyer
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Justice Anthony Kennedy
Apparently, Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor have yet to rule on the issue of abortion as Supreme Court Justices. But their writings, speeches, and political affiliations leave little doubt as to where they stand - squarely on the side of their genocidal compatriots.
Five seats of the Supreme Court of the United States have become thrones for murderous warlords.
Like slavery before it, this issue will come to define the Republic in this century.
This evil must be undone. The American people have triumphed over empires, slavery, Nazis, terrorists, and Communist superpowers. We must now triumph over the dark manifestations of our own failure to grasp unquenchable moral truths. A new regime should be put in place, if necessary, to save the lives of the children these five will otherwise see murdered.
Quite strong words! Well since I have a kid, I've given it some thought. Raising a child right is no easy task, and even if you and your significant other, and families are putting in 110% to make sure you're doing a good job it's still really freakin' hard. I don't think it's fair for parents that don't want to have a baby to subject a new life onto this planet that isn't loved and basic and emotional taken care of. The consequences for someone that doesn't feel loved in this world are just so vast, leading this child to a life of a severe disadvantage when they need every ounce of love and compassion and advantage in this difficult and complex world such as ours. So I'll have to disagree with you. I'm pro-choice for this reason. There are too many kids out there that have parents that really don't want them, and you really can't choose your parents.
ReplyDeleteAdding to that, if a child does come into this world unloved and feeling neglected in this world, we as a society don't have the resources to help this child. There is no network of orphanages nor adoption agencies with willing parents able to help this child. Expecting a child to 'get over' their bad luck is a pretty big ask and takes a certain level of self-awareness and wisdom not usually seen for many years.
Perhaps these parents should've thought of the consequences before having sex, but I feel when it comes to sex human beings aren't rational creatures when it comes to these strong raw emotions. To somehow restrict these emotions, whether making it illegal, or making them feel guilty for having them hasn't worked in the past so why would it work now?
Ah well, just my thoughts!
Thanks for saying something Cameron.
ReplyDeleteCertainly, I'm not out here to police or even comment on people's sexual behavior. That would by hypocritical and probably not helpful.
But the point is, the Supreme Court can't make people better parents. I don't think it's somehow responsible to murder an unborn child because you aren't ready to be a parent. The only responsible thing to do in that scenario is be as ready as you can be. Parenting is very tough and it's scary to be in a crisis pregnancy scenario. That's kinda why I'm so irrevocably against the Supreme Court's abortion stance. We look to the leaders and authority figures like the Justices for not just black and white legal rulings, but to shape the nature and timbre of our society where it intersects with law. Roe v. Wade can feel like it's giving people, especially women, a free moral pass. I don't feel like any restriction of emotions about sex would work and that's certainly not what I'm trying to do. I'm simply saying that as a social and legal phenomenon, murder is wrong and that overrides the other concerns, as significant as they are.
When the kids whose parents didn't want them grow up, they will be free to have lives and make their own choices. I guess I feel like it's better to have a life and a chance than to be killed before you even are born.